Stuart Langridge, Jono Bacon, and Jeremy Garcia present Bad Voltage, in which there is charity and there is hope but there is not a lot of faith, and:
- [00:02:50] Lenovo are apparently making a Thinkpad-brand foldable PC next year. We have Thoughts, not surprisingly
- [00:08:40] Uber finally do their IPO, which manages to seriously underperform expectations and yet still be the 9th biggest US IPO ever
- [00:11:10] Someone comes up with a worrying Whatsapp remote exploit -- dial a call which would then buffer overflow the target and install software on it. It went unmentioned in the release notes, although maybe that's a good thing because people don't install security updates?
- [00:13:50] Drinking six or more coffees a day can be detrimental to your health. In other news, a bear prays, and the Pope was seen heading into the woods with a roll of toilet paper
- [00:15:20] Our main feature: lots of people think it's unfair if their open source software is bundled up and sold by someone putting no effort into it. This is certainly legal, but there seem to be more developers who are disillusioned about this, both for personal projects and in large enterprises. Historically the response has been: that's legal, so you just have to live with it. But as the open source world has changed, is that still a good answer? Maybe those developers do need to live with it, but perhaps there should be a better explanation as to why living with it is actually better in the long term? Or maybe the open source pitch itself should change, or the world should: can we do better than dismissing people's concerns rather than helping them understand?
Come chat with us and the community in our Slack channel via https://badvoltage-slack.herokuapp.com/!
Download from https://badvoltage.org