Thanks for clarifying. I think we are getting somewhere. Hereâs his statement again. It would be helpful to understand where the difference of opinion lies. So letâs break it down:
cmgbeyer: apologies if this seems laboured, but could you tell me which of the following statements in each set best represents your view?
A) Men and women, considered as groups, have different distributions of preferences on no topics at all - their preferences are entirely identical in every respect.
B) Men and women, considered as groups, have different distributions of preferences on some topics, but those topics do not include job choice.
C) Men and women, considered as groups, have different distributions of preferences on some topics, and those topics include job choices.
A) Men and women, considered as groups, have different distributions of abilities on no topics at all - their abilities are entirely identical in every respect.
B) Men and women, considered as groups, have different distributions of abilities in some areas, but those areas do not include ability in any job.
C) Men and women, considered as groups, have different distributions of abilities in some areas, and those areas include ability in some jobs, but not in computer programming.
D) Men and women, considered as groups, have different distributions of abilities in some areas, and those areas include ability in some jobs, including computer programming.
If you answered anything other than A) to 1):
A) Those preference differences have no biological basis whatsoever.
B) Those preference differences have, at least in part, a biological basis.
If you answered anything other than A) to 2):
A) Those ability differences have no biological basis whatsoever.
B) Those ability differences have, at least in part, a biological basis.
If you would be kind enough to do that, I think it might become clear exactly where the disagreement lies.
(I also think there are some problems with your chain of âErgoâ logic, but this message is already long enough, so weâll leave that for later.
Gerv